Catching things early and treating them can be less costly on an individual basis. Like if there is a $1,000 Test and a $3,000 operation to catch and remove cancer early- of course costs less than a $30,000 advanced cancer treatment. However, if one in 500 women test positive to the test, financially, is is a good investment? There are thousands of possible tests that could catch early problems. Should you pay for all of them because preventative care is less expensive than catching something late? You coldn't afford it. Well, unless these test costs went down significantly because they were so wide scale. Some common tests are run on newborns- like phynelkuteneria. what other tests are run on newborns? I do like the european system talked about in Sicko- bonuses for getting patients to have lower blood pressure. -tc said that her friend brought a universal remote to school and got to a
class early, turned the tv so the teacher couldn't see the screen, and put a football game on.

Thank you for using Picture and Video Messaging by U.S. Cellular. See www.uscellular.com for info.